designates my notes. / designates important.
The story itself was mildly interesting and made the read a breeze, but honestly I wasn’t particularly drawn in. I guessed what actually happened though while there is no hard evidence of what actually happened.
What I found more interesting is some of the incidental revelations of what life was life in the Soviet Union circa 1959.
A typical Soviet school day was broken into two periods: a morning session devoted to proper lessons, followed by a less structured afternoon session, during which pupils could pursue their own activities or gather for guest speakers.
Unstructured learning, from what little insight I have via this book, seemed to be effective. There were a great many well educated citizens of the Soviet Union.
Furthermore, women were on equal footing with men.
and then it collapsed…
This equality was reflected in the Dyatlov group, where Zina and Lyuda were considered as capable as their male counterparts. “Within the team there was no gender. We were all equal in everything. We had a strict code of ethics and discipline.”
Yudin admits that the male members of the hiking group—Igor, Georgy and Doroshenko, in particular—had crushes on Zina, but he says there was shame attached to expressing interest in one person.
Another potential reason for failure? Shame for monogamy.